Sports Team Shower Curtains
Good Number Of Football Kits
How Clay Matthews' Retro Alternate Jersey Boosted My Nfl Interest
Be A Genuine Fan And Pick The Right Nike Nfl Jersey
Nebraska Unveils New Uniforms For Game Against Ucla
Scoring With Sports Fundraising
Get Affordable Chicago Bears Jerseys Online
How Create Shopping For Men's Clothing Easy
Guide To Sports Activities Jerseys Cheap
Cheap Wholesale Nfl Jerseys Are Most Beneficial Choice
You Can Purchase Genuine Jerseys Online
Complaint About Football Jerseys

I am director and founder of Triangle f and giyanopedia.in. Here are we to provide each one with quality information and advice on various aspects of life... all in one.... giyanopedia... all hail triangle f

3 Comments

  1. Just a random internet surfer
    July 5, 2017 @ 10:25 pm

    I must say this article have lot of errors first of all who said mediatek is not battery efficient. The efficiency depends on how the interface of your OS handles the different activities.Secondly mediatek is not slow it starts with a moderate speed and keep it constant to give good performance.And the biggest error of all Qualcomm is not expensive the cheapest yet very efficient and powerful Qualcomm device is available for Rs 5999 only a.k.a. Redmi 4a.

    Reply

    • Tushar
      July 7, 2017 @ 4:28 pm

      Bro you can yourself google it up.
      Yes, Qualcomm is expensive and Xiaomi is offering Snapdragon 425 in Redmi 4a which itself is a cheap processor…

      Coming to speed… Use any micromax phone or Karbonn phone they use mediatek processors and on the other hand use Xiaomi’s any Qualcomm phone of same price..
      Compare the speeds of both the phones and you will get your answers easily.

      You can also see the benchmark scores of both the SoC’s Qualcomm does much better compared to mediatek when it comes to processing.
      Hope that helps
      -Peace Out✌

      Reply

  2. Abhimanyu Jadli
    July 7, 2017 @ 4:32 pm

    that’s the reason why technical guruji outrages MediaTek…

    Reply

Leave a Reply